Course taught in the architecture program at the University of San Diego in Fall’19.

Course Description: To be modern is to confront the demands of the dynamism of reason, progress, growth, and movement. This course will examine the architecture that some of these forces shaped. In lieu of an exhaustive survey, this course will examine modern architecture’s impetus, foils, and products through key figures and projects during the period between the mid 19th century until right after the second world war. This history is always incomplete and conditional. There is no one modern; there is no one modernism. We will develop a plural sense of modern architecture by returning to very particular historical, social, technological, political, and material contexts.

As a meta exercise, this course will also address what it means to have a modernist pedagogical canon and why this exercise matters. We will discuss the stakes of approaching such a canon with both a receptive and critical posture.

Syllabus can be found here.

// “Life Happens” pass inspired by Dr. Robin Mitchell

DUST: Communicating Indeterminacy 
Making and Doing Exhibit : 4S Conference | New Orleans, 4-7 Sep. 2019
Recieved the Making and Doing Award.

Abstract: How and why do we model and control dust? In its various entanglements, dust, as both a scientific and non-scientific diffuse object is material and discursive but evades measure. It is variously governed through metaphor, myth, story and model. Through this exhibit, I present two things: 1. A suite of scientific and non-scientific epistemic objects and the practices that they convene through which we have made sense of dust  2. A method of setting up research questions through the medium of a (scholarly) picture book. The picture book follows a little boy and his companion vacuum cleaner who ask questions of dust. This narrative of imagined engagements rooted in specific experiences brings together voices from interdisciplinary networks of actors to whom dust has come to matter. Working together, these two strands lay out the stakes of unequal knowledge regimes when grappling with indeterminacy via dust.


Photos from the installation at the Making and Doing session at 4S 2019. 
Symposium | April 11 & 12, 2019

I co-organized a 2 day graduate Science Studies mini-symposium sponsored by the Science Studies Program at UCSD. Dr.Lorraine Daston was invited to lead graduate workshops and deliver a university-wide lecture titled BIG CALCULATION AND THE HISTORY OF INTELLIGENCE. Graduate students from various UCs presented their work at the graduate workshops.

Iris Clever, Cecelia Opatken-Ringdal, Ranjodh Singh Dhariwal, Anne O’Connor, Joshua McGuffie, Matthew Soleiman, Hailey Kwon, Sky Michael Johnston, Patrícia Martins Marcos, Akshita Sivakumar. 

My presentation, titled Being Particular About Particles: Diffuse Objects in Computer Graphics and Physical Science set up dust as a scientific and technical diffuse object which begins to problematize how the field of computer graphics and the physical sciences are calibrated on the solid. 

Poster design: Akshita Sivakumar


Scaffolding learning through convening objects
Spring. 2018

This experimental project is based out “performance anxiety” in discussion groups. It asks how might we scaffold discussion of texts in ways which rehearse actions of sameness and difference of opinion. The project was conceived and iterated in parallel with Lilly Irani’s course titled Design and Politics taught in Spring, 2018. The content of the fold-outs draws largely from the readings on the course syllabus, which can be found here.
Concevied of and iterated over as convening objects, these fold-outs bring together major themes, discussion topics, and quetions which can then be modified in small groups. Each of these foldouts is based on the theme for the respective week, and invites participation while scaffolding learning. 








A Polylogue to Practice the Malleability of
an Aesthetic and Spatial Sense of Self


This thesis contends that basic architectural design training requires malleable aesthetic and spatial sensibilities which in turn can cultivate a pliable and multiple sense of self. “A sense of self” here draws on William James’s and Ulric Neisser’s plural ways of conceiving and knowing oneself through self-knowledge, self-consciousness and self-agency, all of which combine to motivate our actions in the world. “Aesthetic”, borrows from Mark Johnson’s definition of constituting the patterns, images, feelings, qualities, and emotions by which meaning is possible for us in every aspect of our lives. “Spatial” captures the ways in which we situate and orient self in the world. How we are trained to perceive, apprehend, cogitate, examine, reflect, record, and practice these sensibilities guides how we  piece together our experiences in the world as a series of aesthetic and spatial fragments. I argue that 1. The cultivation of multiple and pliable attributes of self is prescient and relevant to fields beyond design. 2. The site of cultivation lies beyond the mind. I build a case that these two contentions are picking up on recent waves in situated, distributed, and embodied cognition and posthuman discourse, that have each reclaimed the body, physical, digital and virtual environments, and the non-human respectively as extended sites of perception and cognition. Posthumanism here, in the terms of physicist and feminist theorist Karen Barad, extends agency to the nonhuman by prefiguring neither human nor nonhuman in interactions.


//Below are some excerpts of the thesis, in no particular order. 



Sample image of shadow stimulus

a. Overview

This experiment is motivated by the following questions : How do we graft interpretation and meaning-making onto stimulus and experience? How do we see shapes in things?  Describing vague shapes is one way to tap into the drivers of imagination — our various internal states including our attitudes, beliefs, emotions, motives, to which we may not have direct access. Further, it tracks the role of tracing in the perception of vague shapes. Does tracing allow one to slow down the perception process to see differently, or to notice more details? It gives the subject and the experimenter methodologically controlled, “phenomenologically enlightened” ways of understanding the importance of first person experience and how this reported experience can affect the experimental results, and experimental design. This experiment employs the shadow and its ability to abstract away material, texture, depth, color, pattern, and tap into deep seated preconceptions and assumptions about meaning-making from vague stimuli.

Both distributed cognition and posthumanism are engendering new aesthetic and spatial abilities that exemplify the multiplicity and malleability of self.  In order to productively instrumentalize their common findings, we need new methodologies and materials that escape individual disciplinary silos which proliferate canons and inhibit the creation of common ground. Design pedagogy has the ability to address the motivations of various fields in order to develop such methodologies. I mediate cognitive science and posthuman discourse in order to make visible their pursuits, knit together their underlying values, and frame their common calls as design problems. Through this, I test out a methodology called Performative Experiment, that articulates the malleability of aesthetic and spatial sensibilities by estranging one from rote moves. 
I propose the shadow and shaded silhouette as materials with which to engage these  methodologies, in order to challenge the object-focused paradigms which have long structured design pedagogy, arguing instead for relational practices. In order to implement the case I’ve built, I present Hogarth’s Silhouettes as a proof of concept of a foundational experiment in design education. My claim is that it puts into play a malleability of aesthetic and spatial sense of self, which constitutes a revisited way of thinking/doing design, across disciplines.

Thesis Supervisor: Mark Goulthorpe (MIT)
Title: Associate Professor of Architecture Design

Readers: Terry Knight (MIT), Morana Alač (UC-San Diego)

Various cognitive and neurocognitive studies have been conducted to show how we gain information about the world from 2D retinal images. We have the capacity to infer solidity and depth from the 2D retinal image, based on visual cues such as shading, perspective and occlusion. Additionally, as Richard Gregory has demonstrated, we carry in our minds “predictive hypotheses” of what we see in the world, that influences our perceptions. This top-down interaction of how we makes sense of visual stimulus clues us into aesthetic and spatial aspects of self. In this experiment, I employ shadows, which flatten depth, to ask questions of how we perceive and make meaning out of vagueness. Do we still infer depth in shadow? Can the infinite in-betweenness of the umbra, penumbra and antumbra, and the fusion of flattened shadows make us infer objects that are not there? Scenes that are not real? In asking these questions, the Performative Experiment not only acknowledges the role of the human as the agent who perceives, but also the shadow image as an agent that influences perception. This intra-acting relationship between non-human stimulus and human perceiver, that generates a joint perceptual capacity, is central to why this is a posthuman Performative Experiment.

“I see a llama speaking to a camel.
  I see the Pope on a Pope mobile”


Participants in the meaning-making from vague shapes experiment

Sample pages from book documenting thesis project




a. This intervention was developed as a result of an analysis of the object-obsessive ways of designing. Arguing that this mindset has been baked into the digital tools what we use and limits the ways in which we can discuss aesthetics and spatiality untethered from the object. By tending instead to silhouettes and shadows -- relational entities, I simulate what simulations might look like, and how it might challenge systemic presuppositions while designing in the digital realm. 

Isolating silhouettes from William Hogarth’s Analysis of Beauty. 1753.

Clip from animation. Percepts of Absence.
Akshita Sivakumar. 2016

Sample reel from animation. Percepts of Absence. 2016

100+ Laskey competition winning entry
with Stephen Kim